menu
(Approved by NWOGP Exec on 18/Mar/2026)
This is for members who create, share, approve or manage online or printed content.
It is to help you communicate confidently, consistently and safely when visibly affiliated with NWOGP.
Escalation does not aim to police private/personal posts with no visible party affiliation. However, once you present yourself publicly in a Green capacity, different responsibilities apply. This is part of the GPEW guidance on transparency and role clarity.
You are not alone. Escalation is a route to support and decision-making. The aim of escalation is to assess acceptability and risk, both legally and politically.
It is not to judge whether content is skilfully crafted, proofread, or likely to be effective: the WhatsApp NWOGP Media Group is the expert forum for these consultations.
If a matter is unclear, sensitive, urgent or high-risk, it should be escalated rather than consulted on in multiple places.
The Media Group will act as an escalation route and decision-maker when specifically requested.
Content Advisors may assist with straightforward questions, but they are not a substitute for escalation in high-risk or disputed cases.
Candidates/Campaign Managers will guide you on agreed messaging for their own ward or campaign and offer advice.
Always do this:
Do not do this:
Escalate immediately if the post or issue involves:
You are not alone. Escalation is a route to support and decision-making. The aim of escalation is to assess acceptability and risk, both legally and politically.
It is not to judge whether content is skilfully crafted, proofread, or likely to be effective: the WhatsApp NWOGP Media Group is the expert forum for these consultations.
If a matter is unclear, sensitive, urgent or high-risk, it should be escalated rather than consulted on in multiple places.
Content Advisors may help with quick views on straightforward questions, but they are not a substitute for escalation in high-risk or disputed cases.
Candidates / Campaign Managers will guide you on agreed messaging for their own ward or campaign.
The Media Group will act as an escalation route and decision-maker when requested.
This section is for members posting in a personal capacity who may sometimes be visibly associated with the Green Party, but are not acting as campaign leads, candidates, councillors or official account admins.
What you can post freely
• Your personal support for Green values, campaigns and candidates
• Local observations, community news and positive local stories
• Reasons you support the Green Party
• Attendance at events, canvassing or leafleting
• Sharing official Green content with your own brief comment
• Respectful discussion of policy details, so long as you stay within agreed party direction
What usually requires a sense check
• Posts that may be read as an official local party position
• Statements about what “the party will do”
• Criticism of another Green member, candidate or councillor
• Posts about a developing controversy, complaint or sensitive incident
• Graphics or videos using prominent local Green branding if newly created
• Anything that could trigger press interest
What you must not post
• Commitments or promises on behalf of the branch
• Private member discussions, screenshots from internal chats, or confidential planning
• Electoral register data or other personal data
• Abuse, personalised attacks, inflammatory labels or pile-ons
• Posts implying you speak for the local party unless authorised
• Public arguments with candidates, councillors or officers
• Material that contradicts settled party direction in a way that presents the party
as divided
When to escalate
• You are unsure whether your post sounds personal or official
• You want to comment on a controversial local issue while identifying as Green
• You think a post may be legally risky, defamatory or misleading
• You are targeted with serious abuse or threats
• You are asked by media to comment on behalf of the party
Imprint reminders
In general, ordinary members acting in their own personal capacity do not need digital imprints. The national Green digital campaigning guidance specifically says members, volunteers and supporters acting personally do not require them, unless they become candidates.
Practical rule:
• do not blur the line between personal and official
• if you later become a candidate, the rules change
• if you are reposting or creating clearly campaign-style material, check before posting
Tone expectations
• Warm, constructive, calm
• Professional disagreement is fine
• No “dunking”, no goading, no personalised abuse
• Focus on why Green, not why not others
Example scenarios:
Fine:
“Great to be out leafleting in Bicester today. Lots of good conversations about buses, green spaces and the cost of living.”
Check first:
“NW Oxfordshire Greens will force the council to do [x policy] as soon as we win.”
Not okay:
“Anyone who disagrees with this is a disgrace and clearly doesn’t care about ordinary people
This section is for members helping with campaigning, canvassing, leaflet rounds, events, content creation or campaign coordination, but who are not standing themselves.
What you can post freely:
What usually requires coordination or a sense check:
What you must not post:
When to escalate
Imprint reminders
Volunteers acting personally do not normally need imprints. But campaign-related content can move into a higher-risk area very quickly. The national Green guidance recommends always including imprints where required and notes that candidates and official channels definitely need them.
Practical rule: if it is clearly campaign material created for a candidate, campaign or official Green account, check whether it should carry the campaign imprint. If in any doubt, escalate before publication.
Tone expectations
Example scenarios
Fine:
“Join us on Saturday for a community litter pick and chat with local Greens.”
Check first:
A new election graphic saying “Vote Green to stop [opponent] ruining the town.”
Not okay:
posting a map or screenshot showing which streets are Green targets, canvass returns, or voter notes.
This section is for any declared candidate, including paper candidates. Candidates have a much higher responsibility because the public may reasonably assume they speak with authority, and because the national imprint guidance says candidates must include imprints when publicly promoting the party or expressing political views online.
What you can post freely:
What usually requires a prior sense check
What you must not post
When to escalate
Imprints
Candidates must treat digital imprints as standard practice.
The national Green digital campaigning guidance says candidates must include imprints when publicly promoting the party or expressing political views online, and recommends always including a digital imprint because the consequences of getting it wrong are high.
Practical rule:
Tone expectations:
Example scenarios
Fine:
“Residents keep raising buses, flooding and housing quality on the doorstep. Those are exactly the issues I want to work on.”
Check first:
“If elected, I will guarantee no rise in [X] and deliver [Y] in the first 100 days.”
Not okay:
“Our Green councillors have got this wrong.”
This section reflects the fact that councillors may operate with several “hats”: personal, party-political, and council/officeholder. The branch has already agreed that people should be clear which hat they are wearing. That clarity is essential.
What you can post freely
What usually requires coordination or prior checking
What you must not post
When to escalate
Imprint reminders
The national Green digital campaigning guidance states that elected Greens must include imprints whenever publicly promoting the party, its policies or elected Greens, and even recommends imprints in councillor signatures where there is any risk the content could be read as promoting the party.
Practical rules:
Tone expectations:
Example scenarios
Fine:
“I met residents today about traffic and pedestrian safety. Thank you to everyone who shared concerns.”
Check first:
“The Green team will definitely vote against this budget line next month.”
Not okay:
using a council-branded channel to campaign against political opponents.
This section covers anyone posting, scheduling, moderating or managing accounts that are officially controlled by the branch or by a candidate/councillor campaign team. Official accounts should follow the strongest approval discipline of any role, because they are most likely to be read as speaking for the branch, a candidate or an elected representative rather than as personal opinion.
What you can post freely
What requires approval
What you must not post
When to escalate
Imprint reminders
Official Green digital communications, including local party social media accounts and websites, must include imprints when publicly promoting the party, candidates or elected Greens. The national digital guidance is explicit on this and recommends always including digital imprints because the rules are broad and mistakes carry serious consequences.
Practical rule:
Tone expectations
Admin and security basics
Official account admins should also follow the national social media guidance on security and access control:
Example scenarios
Fine:
posting an approved event graphic for a canvassing session.
Check first:
a quick rebuttal graphic calling out an opponent’s claim as “lies”.
Not okay:
an admin using the branch account to post a personal rant or intervene in an internal dispute.